# Title:   Clustering of Local Group distances: publication bias or
#          correlated measurements? II. M31 and beyond
# Authors: Richard de Grijs, Giuseppe Bono
# Journal: The Astronomical Journal, 148, 17 (2014)
# Table:   ngc205distbytracer.dat
#
# updated 27/01/2014
#
# Tracers covered separately: TRGB, RR Lyrae, PNLF, Other
#
# MM YYYY (m-M)0 Uncertainties   References; notes
#                 Stat.  Syst.
#
# TRGB:
09 1944  22.4  0.    # Baade 1944, ApJ, 100, 137; brightest stars, matched to Cepheid distance scale
08 1955  24.2  0.    # Baum & Schwarzschild 1955, AJ, 60, 247; brightest stars in clusters
03 1984  24.43 0.15  # Mould et al. 1984, ApJ, 278, 575; I
00 1992  24.37 0.1   # Lee et al. 1992, Proc. IAU Symp., 149, 444; I
08 1997  24.56 0.    # Salaris & Cassisi 1997, MNRAS, 289, 406
08 1997  24.46 0.    # Salaris & Cassisi 1997, MNRAS, 289, 406; theory
07 1998  24.54 0.22  # Salaris & Cassisi 1998, MNRAS, 298, 166; Da Costa & Armandroff (1990) calibration
07 1998  24.62 0.22  # Salaris & Cassisi 1998, MNRAS, 298, 166; Green (1988) calibration
07 1998  24.61 0.22  # Salaris & Cassisi 1998, MNRAS, 298, 166; Kurucz (1979) calibration
01 1999  24.7  0.    # Geisler et al. 1999, Proc. IAU Symp. 192, 231; by eye
02 2000  24.30 0.21  # Ferrarese et al. 2000, ApJ, 529, 745
05 2003  24.44 0.    # Nowotny et al. 2003, A&A, 403, 93; no error
01 2005  24.58 0.07  # McConnachie et al. 2005, MNRAS, 356, 979
05 2005  24.76 0.1   # Butler & Martínez-Delgado 2005, AJ, 129, 2217; I
06 2005  24.45 0.14  # Dolphin 2005, astro-ph/0506430
03 2008  24.40 0.    # Tully et al. 2008, ApJ, 676, 184
08 2009  24.49 0.02  # Jacobs et al. 2009, AJ, 138, 332
12 2009  24.10 0.08  # Jung et al. 2009, JASS, 26, 417; J
12 2009  24.08 0.12  # Jung et al. 2009, JASS, 26, 417; H
12 2009  24.14 0.14  # Jung et al. 2009, JASS, 26, 417; K
#
# RR Lyrae:
00 1992  24.31 0.    # Carney 1992, Mem. Soc. Astron. It., 63, 409; no error
01 1992  24.65 0.25  # Saha et al. 1992, AJ, 103, 84
06 1995  24.59 0.    # van den Bergh 1995, ApJ, 446, 39; data from Saha et al. (1992)
08 1997  24.68 0.    # Salaris & Cassisi 1997, MNRAS, 289, 406
08 1997  24.82 0.    # Salaris & Cassisi 1997, MNRAS, 289, 406; [M/H] = -1.5 dex
07 1998  24.90 0.20  # Salaris & Cassisi 1998, MNRAS, 298, 166
07 1998  25.01 0.20  # Salaris & Cassisi 1998, MNRAS, 298, 166; [M/H] = -1.5 dex
05 2008  24.65 0.    # Tammann et al. 2008, ApJ, 679, 52
#
# PNLF:
00 1988  24.62 0.13  # Jacoby et al. 1988, ASP Conf. Ser., 4, 42
04 1989  24.68 0.35  # Ciardullo et al. 1989, ApJ, 339, 53
02 2000  24.68 0.51  # Ferrarese et al. 2000, ApJ, 529, 745
02 2005  24.65 0.21  # Corradi et al. 2005, A&A, 431, 555
#
# Other:
12 1926  24.5  0.    # Hubble 1926, ApJ, 64, 321; based on system luminosity
02 1956  24.2  0.    # Baade 1956, PASP, 68, 5; Cepheids
02 1968  24.68 0.    # Sandage & Tamann 1968, ApJ, 151, 531; Cepheids
06 1981  24.23 0.    # Tonry & Davis 1981, ApJ, 246, 666; velocity flows
12 1984  24.5  0.4   # Richer et al. 1984, ApJ, 287, 138; carbon stars
05 1991  24.52 0.13  # Tonry 1991, ApJ, 373, L1; SBF matched to Cepheid distance scale
10 1996  24.6  0.3   # Lee 1996, AJ, 112, 1438; average of literature values
00 2000  24.54 0.09  # van den Bergh 2000, Galaxies of the Local Group (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press); unweighted average
11 2006  24.38 0.1   # Sharina et al. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 1259; CMD fit
08 2008  24.50 0.08  # Howley et al. 2008, ApJ, 683, 722; orbit modelling
09 2009  24.23 0.    # Devereux et al. 2009, ApJ, 702, 955; velocity flows, based on Tully (2007, priv. comm.)